Form 10-K for SUNERGY INC

20-Apr-2009

Annual Report


Item 7.

Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The following discussion should be read in conjunction with our audited financial statements and the related notes that appear elsewhere in this annual report. The following discussion contains forward-looking statements that reflect our plans, estimates and beliefs. Our actual results could differ materially from those discussed in the forward looking statements. Factors that could cause or contribute to such differences include, but are not limited to, those discussed below and elsewhere in this annual report, particularly in the section entitled "Risk Factors" beginning on page 12 of this annual report.

Our audited financial statements are stated in United States Dollars and are prepared in accordance with United States Generally Accepted Accounting Principles.


Results of Operations for our Years Ended December 31, 2008 and 2007

Results of Operations

Year Ended December 31, 2008 and 2007


                          Year Ended
                          December 31
                        2008      2007
 Revenue             $    Nil  $    Nil
 Operating Expenses  $ 98,445  $ 55,103
 Net Loss            $ 98,445  $ 55,103

Expenses

Our operating expenses for the year ended December 31, 2008 and December 31,
2007 are outlined in the table below:


                                           Year Ended
                                           December 31
                                         2008      2007
 Accounting and audit fees            $ 39,582  $ 14,885
 Bank charges                         $    363  $    149
 Consulting fees                      $    Nil  $  5,000
 Director fees                        $  4.500  $      -
 Filing fees and transfer agent fees  $  9,641  $ 10.986
 Foreign exchange                     $    485  $    Nil
 Interest                             $  2,562  $  2,218
 Legal fees                           $ 15,438  $    Nil
 Office and miscellaneous             $    Nil  $    Nil
 Management fees                      $ 18,000  $ 12,000

 Mineral property costs               $  1,874  $  3,865
 Rent                                 $  6,000  $  6,000


Operating expenses for the year ended December 31, 2008, increased by 78.66% as compared to the comparative period in 2007 primarily as a result of an increase in accounting and audit fees, an increase in legal fees and an increase in management fees.

Revenue

We did not earn any revenues during the year ended December 31, 2008. We do not anticipate earning revenues until such time as we have entered into commercial production on the Hummingbird property. We have not commenced the exploration stage of our business and can provide no assurance that we will discover economic mineralization on the property, or if such minerals are discovered, that we will enter into commercial production.

Equity Compensation

We currently do not have any stock option or equity compensation plans or arrangements.

Liquidity and Financial Condition

Working Capital
                                At
                             December         At
                               31,         Dec. 31,    Increase/
                               2008          2007      Decrease
Current Assets             $      648    $    2,907       (2,259 )
Current Liabilities        $  371,962    $  168,276      203,686
Working Capital (deficit)  $ (371,314 )  $ (165,369 )   (205,945 )

Cash Flows
                                              Year Ended        Year Ended
                                             December 31,      December 31,
                                                 2008              2007
Net Cash Used in Operating Activities      $      (72,993 )  $      (32,105 )
Net Cash Provided by Investing Activities  $      (12,500 )  $          Nil
Net Cash Provided by Financing Activities  $       85,946    $       32,300
Increase in Cash During the Period         $          453    $          195


On October 10 2008, we issued 600,000 units at a purchase price of $0.25 per unit for gross proceeds of $150,000 to three subscribers. Each unit consists of one common share and one common share purchase warrant. Each warrant entitling the holder to purchase one share of our common stock at a price of $0.25 per share for a period of 24 months from the date of issuance. An aggregate of 400,000 units were issued to two U.S. persons (as that term is defined in Regulation S of the Securities Act of 1933) relying upon Rule 506 of Regulation D of the Securities Act of 1933 and 200,000 units were issued to one non-U.S. person (as that term is defined in Regulation S promulgated under the Securities Act of 1933) relying on the exemption from registration provided by Regulation S and/or Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933.

As at December 31, 2008, we had received $5,000 in respect of a subscription for 20,000 units at $0.25 per unit. Each unit consists of a common share and one common share purchase warrant entitling the holder to purchase an additional common share at $0.25 for a period of 24 months from the date of closing of the offering. These shares have not yet been issued.

Subsequent to December 31, 2008, we received $31,700 in respect of share subscriptions for 126,800 units at $0.25 per unit. Each unit consists of one common share and one common share purchase warrant. Each warrant entitles the holder to purchase an additional common share $0.25 per share for a period of 24 months from the date of the closing of offering. These shares have not yet been issued.

Contractual Obligations

As a "smaller reporting company", we are not required to provide tabular disclosure obligations.

Going Concern

We anticipate that additional funding will be required in the form of equity financing from the sale of our common stock. At this time, we cannot provide investors with any assurance that we will be able to raise sufficient funding from the sale of our common stock or through a loan from our directors to meet our obligations over the next twelve months. We do not have any arrangements in place for any future debt or equity financing.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We have no significant off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources that are material to stockholders.

Critical Accounting Policies

The discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based upon our financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with the accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Preparing financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenue, and expenses. These estimates and assumptions are affected by management's application of accounting policies. We believe that understanding the basis and nature of the estimates and assumptions involved with the following aspects of our financial statements is critical to an understanding of our financial statements.

Exploration Stage Company

The Company complies with Financial Accounting Standards Board Statement No. 7 and Securities and Exchange Commission Act Guide 7 for its characterization of the Company as exploration stage. All losses accumulated since inception has been considered as part of the Company's exploration stage activities.

Mineral Property Costs

Mineral property exploration costs are expensed as incurred. Mineral property acquisition costs are initially capitalized when incurred using the guidance in EITF 04-02, "Whether Mineral Rights Are Tangible or Intangible Assets". The Company assesses the carrying costs for impairment under SFAS 144, "Accounting for Impairment or Disposal of Long Lived Assets" at each fiscal quarter end. When it has been determined that a mineral property can be economically developed as a result of establishing proven and probable reserves, the costs then incurred to develop such property, are capitalized. Such costs will be amortized using the units-of-production method over the estimated life of the probable reserve. If mineral properties are subsequently abandoned or impaired, any capitalized costs will be charged to operations.


Environmental Costs

Environmental expenditures that relate to current operations are expensed or capitalized as appropriate. Expenditures that relate to an existing condition caused by past operations, and which do not contribute to current or future revenue generation, are expensed. Liabilities are recorded when environmental assessments and/or remedial efforts are probable, and the cost can be reasonably estimated. Generally, the timing of these accruals coincides with the earlier of completion of a feasibility study or the Company's commitments to plan of action based on the then known facts.

Asset Retirement Obligation

The Company accounts for asset retirement obligations in accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 143 "Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations". SFAS No. 143 requires the Company to record the fair value of an asset retirement obligation as a liability in the period in which it incurs a legal obligation associated with the retirement of tangible long-lived assets that result from the acquisition, construction, development and/or normal use of the assets. At December 31, 2008, the Company had not undertaken any drilling activity on its properties and had not incurred significant reclamation obligations. As such, no asset retirement obligation accrual was made in the December 31, 2008 and 2007 financial statements.

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

The Company reviews the recoverability of its long-lived assets as required by SFAS No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets, whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of such assets may not be recoverable. The estimated future cash flows are based upon, among other things, assumptions about future operating performance, and may differ from actual cash flows. Long-lived assets evaluated for impairment are grouped with other assets to the lowest level for which identifiable cash flows are largely independent of the cash flows of other groups of assets and liabilities. If the sum of the projected undiscounted cash flows (excluding interest) is less than the carrying value of the assets, the assets will be written down to the estimated fair value in the period in which the determination is made.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

Recently adopted accounting pronouncements

On September 15, 2006, FASB issued Statement No. 157, "Fair Value Measurements" ("SFAS No. 157"). SFAS No. 157 provides guidance for using fair value to measure assets and liabilities. SFAS No. 157 references fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants in the market in which the reporting entity transacts. SFAS No. 157 applies whenever other standards require (or permit) assets or liabilities to be measured at fair value. SFAS No. 157 does not expand the use of fair value in any new circumstances. Originally, SFAS No. 157 was effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007, and interim periods within those fiscal years. Accordingly, we adopted SFAS No. 157 in the first quarter of fiscal year 2008. In February 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position No. 157-2, "Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 157", which provides a one year deferral of the effective date of SFAS No. 157 for non-financial assets and non-financial liabilities, except those that are recognized or disclosed in the financial statements at fair value at least annually. Therefore, the Company has adopted the provisions of SFAS No. 157 with respect to its financial assets and liabilities only.


On January 1, 2008, the Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standard ("SFAS") No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities-Including an amendment of FASB Statement No. 115. SFAS No. 159 gives us the irrevocable option to elect fair value for the initial and subsequent measurement for certain financial assets and liabilities on a contract-by-contract basis with the difference between the carrying value before election of the fair value option and the fair value recorded upon election as an adjustment to beginning retained earnings. As of December 31, 2008, the Company had not elected the fair value option for any eligible financial asset or liability.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements Not Yet Adopted

In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141 (Revised) "Business Combinations". SFAS 141 (Revised) establishes principles and requirements for how the acquirer of a business recognizes and measures in its financial statements the identifiable assets acquired, the liabilities assumed, and any non-controlling interest in the acquiree. The statement also provides guidance for recognizing and measuring the goodwill acquired in the business combination and determines what information to disclose to enable users of the financial statements to evaluate the nature and financial effects of the business combination. The guidance will become effective for the first fiscal year beginning after December 15, 2008. The Company's management is in the process of evaluating the impact SFAS 141 (Revised) will have on the Company's financial statements upon adoption.

In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160 "Non-controlling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements-an amendment of ARB No. 51". SFAS 160 establishes accounting and reporting standards for the non-controlling interest in a subsidiary and for the deconsolidation of a subsidiary. The guidance will become effective for the first fiscal year beginning after December 15, 2008.
The Company's management is in the process of evaluating the impact SFAS 160 will have on the Company's financial statements upon adoption.

In January 2008, Staff Accounting Bulletin ("SAB") 110, "Share-Based Payment" was issued. Registrants may continue, under certain circumstances, to use the simplified method in developing estimates of the expected term of share options as initially allowed by SAB 107, "Share-Based Payment". The adoption of SAB 110 should have no effect on the financial position and results of operations of the Company.

In March 2008, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 161, "Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities", an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133 "Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities" ("SFAS 133") , which requires additional disclosures about the objectives of the derivative instruments and hedging activities, the method of accounting for such instruments under SFAS No. 133 and its related interpretations, and a tabular disclosure of the effects of such instruments and related hedged items on financial position, financial performance and cash flows. SFAS No. 161 is effective for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after November 15, 2008. The adoption of SFAS 161 should have no effect on the financial position and results of operations of the Company.

In May 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 162, The Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles ("SFAS No. 162"). SFAS No. 162 is intended to improve financial reporting by identifying a consistent framework, or hierarchy, for selecting accounting principles to be used in preparing financial statements that are presented in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles for nongovernmental entities. SFAS No. 162 is effective 60 days following the SEC's approval of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board Auditing amendments to AU Section 411, The Meaning of Present Fairly in Conformity with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles. The Company does not expect there to be any significant impact of adopting SFAS 162 on its financial position, cash flows and results of operations.


In May 2008, the FASB issued FSP No. APB 14-1, "Accounting for Convertible Debt Instruments That May Be Settled in Cash upon Conversion (Including Partial Cash Settlement)" ("FSP APB 14-1"). FSP APB 14-1 applies to convertible debt instruments that, by their stated terms, may be settled in cash (or other assets) upon conversion, including partial cash settlement, unless the embedded conversion option is required to be separately accounted for as a derivative under SFAS 133. Convertible debt instruments within the scope of FSP APB 14-1 are not addressed by the existing APB 14. FSP APB 14-1 requires that the liability and equity components of convertible debt instruments within the scope of FSP APB 14-1 be separately accounted for in a manner that reflects the entity's nonconvertible debt borrowing rate. This requires an allocation of the convertible debt proceeds between the liability component and the embedded conversion option (i.e., the equity component). The difference between the principal amount of the debt and the amount of the proceeds allocated to the liability component will be reported as a debt discount and subsequently amortized to earnings over the instrument's expected life using the effective interest method. FSP APB 14-1 is effective for the Company's fiscal year beginning January 1, 2009 and will be applied retrospectively to all periods presented. The Company is currently evaluating the effects of adopting FSP APB 14-1.

In June 2008, the FASB ratified the consensus reached on EITF Issue No. 07-05, "Determining Whether an Instrument (or Embedded Feature) Is Indexed to an Entity's Own Stock." EITF Issue No. 07-05 clarifies the determination of whether an instrument (or an embedded feature) is indexed to an entity's own stock, which would qualify as a scope exception under SFAS No. 133. EITF Issue No. 07-05 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008. Early adoption for existing instruments is not permitted. The Company does not believe that the pending adoption of EITF Issue No. 07-05 will have a material effect on the Company's financial statements

Item 7A.

 

Contact Info:
Joseph B. Guerrero
President
Sunergy Inc.
8711 E. Paraiso Dr., Scottsdale, AZ  85255
Phone: 480.477.5810
scottsdaleinvestments@yahoo.com

 

14362 N. FRANK LLOYD WRIGHT BLVD | SCOTTSDALE AZ 85260
Phone: 480.477.5810 | Fax: 480.477.5811

scottsdaleinvestments@yahoo.com

www.sunergygold.com

 

 

 

SUNERGY, Inc.
Managements Plan With Budgets To Achieve Near Term Gold Production
Nyinahin Mining Concession near Bibiani, Ghana, West Africa

 

SUNERGY, INC | 14362 N. FRANK LLOYD WRIGHT BLVD | SCOTTSDALE AZ 85260